Illocutionary force and attitude mode in normative disputes

نویسندگان

چکیده

Disagreements about what we owe to each other and how live pervade different dimensions of human interaction. We communicate our moral normative views in discourse. These disputes have features that are challenging some semantic theories. This paper assesses recent Stalnakerian communication domains. model conversational context updates made with claims. They also aim explain between people who follow norms or values. The presents various problems for these views. Together, the show insufficiency metasemantic theories based only on speakers’ psychological states general, their application particular. concludes require a new conception common ground relates illocutionary force attitude mode.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force

The term 'emoticons'—short for 'emotion icons'—refers to graphic signs, such as the smiley face, that often accompany computer-mediated textual communication. They are most often characterized as iconic indicators of emotion, conveyed through a communication channel that is parallel to the linguistic one. In this article, it is argued that this conception of emoticons fails to account for some ...

متن کامل

The semantics of attitude markers and other illocutionary content

Intuitively, attitude markers like alas encode not-at-issue information about the speaker’s attitude towards the content of the sentence it occurs in (Frege, 1956; Vanderveken, 1990). Using attitude markers as a case study, I argue that there is in fact a difference between this type of content and canonical not-at-issue content, like that encoded in utterance modifiers like frankly or evidenti...

متن کامل

Claims and Jurisdictions in Medical Matters Disputes

Medical claims are all disputes that are somehow related to the medical and related matters so its subject is wide-ranging. These are civil, criminal and diciplinair medical cases, and due to the multy natures of such cases, we are likely to see numerous authorities to them. Furthermore, here expert medical expertise and expert opinion play an important role, but the rules are somewhat conflict...

متن کامل

Reference and Computational Models of Illocutionary Acts

My general goal in this paper is to explore possible relations between a cognitive analysis of the notion of reference on the one hand, and computational models of speech acts (illocutionary acts, to be precise) on the other. On the cognitive side, we have the following problem: how can thoughts (and sentences that articulate them) be about objects? The deceptive simplicity of the question mask...

متن کامل

Building arguments with argumentation: the role of illocutionary force in computational models of argument

Chris REED a 1, Simon WELLS , Katarzyna BUDZYŃSKA b,a and Joseph DEVEREUX a a School of Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK b Institute of Philosophy, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Poland Abstract. This paper builds upon the proposed dialogical extensions to the AIF, termed AIF+, by making explicit the representation of the role of illocutionary force in the connection...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Metaphilosophy

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1467-9973', '0026-1068']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12488